On Beauty

I could not have said it better and I did not:

“Perfection is illusory. The most spectacular of cars gets you from point A to point B no different than the most practical and inexpensive. The perfect male or female body is only as desirable as what it contains, no matter our initial sexual impulses. No matter how attractive something is, if [its] nature is ugly then no amount of wishful thinking can amend it.” Matthew Good

In particular, Matt Good’s entry justifies why more and more people feel gradual attraction to those that they would not otherwise have a consistent and fiery chemistry with – or they would ordinarily be attracted to a different type of package. Is it possible that the mainstream package that (should) attract us does not seduce all our senses or leaves us cold in the areas that matter the most, mainly the soul? Instead, we find ourselves warming up to people for a whole set of reasons and realise that while there is physical attraction, it does not make as much of a dent as the fashion magazines would have us believe. Furthermore, we find ourselves sexually and physically attracted to this supposed anti-prototype even more than your typical beautiful package in the long run.

Isolation in the City

Despite the many privileges that the urban experience offers us, we are, nonetheless, driven to feel, think, and act in a decidedly individualistic manner which manifests itself in trivial as well as larger matters. While I am a city girl, I have always had a penchant for another epoch where globalization and technology did not hamper our quality of life, when we were still neighbours and reveled in our communal experience. Indeed, I yearn for a time when incessant mobile phones had not effortlessly replaced a warm touch and meaningful conversation. It was not until I was examining a poignant passage written across the Atlantic in another era that I truly realized how we are bound to err on the side of history time and time (and time) again. The following passage will attempt to demonstrate my malaise in a more articulate fashion:

“Hundreds and thousands of men and women drawn from all classes and ranks of society pack the streets of London. Are they not all human beings? With the same innate characteristics and potentialities? Are they not all equally interested in the pursuit of happiness? And do they not all aim at happiness by following similar methods? Yet they rush past each other as if they had nothing in common. They are tacitly agreed on one thing only, that everyone should keep to the right of the pavement so as not to collide with the stream of people moving in the opposite direction. No one even thinks of sparing a glance for his neighbours in the streets.

The more that Londoners are packed into a tiny space the more repulsive and disgraceful becomes the brutal indifference with which they ignore their neighbours and selfishly concentrate upon their private affairs. We know well enough that this isolation of the individual – this narrow minded egotism – is everywhere the fundamental principle of modern society. But nowhere is this selfish egotism so blatantly evident as in the frantic bustle of the great city. The disintegration of society into individuals each guided by his private principles and each pursuing his own aims has been pushed to its furthest limits in London. Here indeed human society has been split into its component atoms.” – from The Condition of the Working Class in England, Friedrich Engels, circa 1845.

The more the world changes, the less human nature changes. . .

We the People

As Stephen Harper’s new minority government is ushered in, Canadians find themselves in the age old quandaryabout the ill-fitted electoral system that continues to serve us. In The Separatist Curve Ball, Joan Bryden maintains that PR (proportional representation) will become a hot topic in Canadian households again. Indeed, the current political climate and the abysmal voter turnout (of all demographics) are prime indicators that there is a dire need for informed debate within academia and the public sphere (and cafés).

My fascination with voting system reform truly unravelled when I took a course in Political Parties and Party Systems last January which in turn broadened my mind to a subfield that, until then, had gone unnoticed. The sexy areas of Political Science are mainly, International Relations, Comparative Politics (my area of study), and Political Economy. Today’s global stage is preoccupied with human security, trade, and globalization and our domestic politics are not, for the most part, newsworthy. We need to wake from our long slumber and talk to one another in order to eventually institute changes that are long overdue.

In addition, Canada’s current SMDP (Single-member district plurality) voting system (or First Past the Post) is gradually becoming antiquated. In a quick survey of the electoral system that European democracies employ, we will realise that the PR system promotes greater representation of the people (including women) which also translates to a significant improvement to voter turnout, and an overall better representation of smaller parties.

Two Solitudes

It was only a matter of time until the usurpers grabbed the throne. Well, no one should be shocked that the Conservatives won the elections considering the waning public morale and general mistrust that Harper and the other party leaders perpetuated during the election (now Canadians are on an equal footing with their American neighbours, at least). Despite winning, the Conservatives’ minority victory was far from the landslide that their cronies were promising. The next 12 to 18 months will tell if “the West is [really] in” or if this government will bear more of the same old, same old that we were accustomed to in the last minority government.

In his victory speech Stephen Harper declared that “the West was [finally] in”, echoing one of his less successful predecessors. In fact, the West is really Alberta, the land of oil, erratic premiers, and unrealistic surplus budgets (i.e. misdirected priorities). However, many Canadians have long felt that Quebec and Ontario manipulate the public arena while the other provinces are short-changed and constantly out of the loop. I would not disagree with the naysayers, but I would rather help bring my country closer together than further alienate anyone, this time the other end of the coast. In fact, there is a stark contrast between these polarizations because while the Liberals may have given in to Quebec’s repeated demands for increased fiscal independence and de-centralization, at least the Liberals maintained the social mores of the nation regardless of their own personal beliefs. On the other hand, I fail to see how Harper will lead this nation into prosperity and government accountability, and advocate the cultural mosaic that makes us a country, fully knowing his intentions, limitations, and agenda.

One of our fiery prime ministers, Pierre Elliot Trudeau, famously proclaimed: “The state has no business in the bedrooms of the nation” and more poignantly still: “Canada will be a strong country when Canadians of all provinces feel at home in all parts of the country, and when they feel that all Canada belongs to them.” Those words comfort me now in the face of indecision, lack of effective leadership, and all around reactionary values which will, I am afraid, be forced upon the Canadian public, sooner or later.